News | Feb 21,2025
While deciding between solid-state relays (SSRs) and electromechanical relays (EMRs), it is critical to know the working principle of each device, their benefits, and their ideal operating conditions. This article will cover the comparisons in switching speed, power consumption, lifespan and other important details of solid state relay vs mechanical relay.
An SSR relay is an electrical device that can be switched electronically with a built-in semiconductor, meaning there are no moving parts unlike a mechanical relay. Instead of traditional electromechanical relays, SSRs employ electrically controlled semiconductor devices such as triacs or thyristors to manage and regulate the high power electrical signals through low power control signals.
Solid-state relays cater to both AC and DC circuits. Nonetheless, the majority of assortments of solid-state relays are purpose-built for AC switching because of their ability to control voltage variations which are characteristic of alternating current systems.
There are generally three main types of solid state relays:
AC-AC SSRs: Control AC loads with AC control signals.
AC-DC SSRs: Control DC loads with AC control signals.
DC-DC SSRs: Switch DC loads using DC control signals.
When solid state relays fail, they are usually rendered inoperable, which means they do not conduct. Because they fail like this, SSRs provide an extra layer of protection against overcurrent situations which is very helpful.
SSRs are ‘rated for’ long life due to the higher reliability achievable with no moving parts. They are considered to not be damaged by repetitive cycles of switching on and off.
An electromechanical relay (EMR) is a device that makes or breaks a circuit using one or more sets of mechanical contacts which are controlled with an electromagnet’ coils. EMRs utilize moving parts to complete the circuits, in contrast to solid state relays EMRs use mechanical parts.
Electromechanical relays are applicable for a wide range of systems but they are less durable due to their mechanical contacts wearing out from repeated cycles. They are also prone to damage from shocks as well as vibrations.
Now let’s compare solid state relay vs mechanical relay across different criteria to determine which might be the best choice for your application.
Criteria | Solid State Relay (SSR) | Electromechanical Relay (EMR) |
Principle of Operation | Uses semiconductors for switching without movement | Uses electromagnetic force to open/close physical contacts |
Size | Compact, ideal for space-limited installations | Larger due to mechanical components |
Switching Speed | Very fast, microsecond range | Slower, 5-15 milliseconds due to mechanical movement |
Power Consumption | Low, milliwatt range | Higher, due to electromagnetic components |
Noise Generation | Minimal noise | Generates noise due to mechanical movement |
Isolation | Superior electrical isolation | Less effective isolation, contacts wear over time |
Shock & Vibration Resistance | High, ideal for harsh environments | Low, moving parts are vulnerable to damage |
Cost | Higher initial cost, but cost-effective long-term | Lower initial cost, but higher long-term maintenance cost |
Lifespan | Millions of cycles, long-lasting | Limited, several hundred to thousand cycles |
Applications | Automation, medical devices, high-speed tasks | High power tasks like motor drives, heaters |
Performance in Harsh Environments | Performs better in vibration, dust, and explosive environments | Struggles in harsh conditions |
Positional Sensitivity | Not position sensitive | Position sensitive, requires proper orientation |
Solid State Relay: Uses semiconductors to switch circuits without physical movement.
Electromechanical Relay: Uses electromagnetic force to open or close physical contacts.
SSR: Typically smaller and more compact, making them ideal for installations with space limitations, such as PCBs and control panels.
EMR: Requires more space due to the mechanical components involved, including contacts and coils.
SSR: Extremely fast, with switching times often in the microsecond range, ideal for high-speed automation.
EMR: Slower switching, typically taking 5-15 milliseconds due to mechanical contact movement.
SSR: Low power consumption, often requiring just milliwatts to operate.
EMR: Typically consumes more power due to the electromagnetic components.
SSR: Minimal noise generation, including electrical and mechanical noise, thanks to the lack of moving parts.
EMR: Generates noise during operation due to the mechanical movement and electrical transients.
SSR: Superior electrical isolation since no physical contact exists between the input and output, enabling efficient switching of high-power circuits with low-power signals.
EMR: Provides isolation but less effectively because physical contacts can wear out and cause degradation over time.
SSR: These are exceptionally shock and vibration resistant which enables these to be used in harsh conditions in the automotive or aeronautics industry.
EMR: With moving components, mechanical shock and vibration can easily damage the device, causing it to malfunction.
SSR: Solid-state relays are more expensive than traditional ones, but they tend to be cheaper after taking the long term value into account because of their durability and reliability.
EMR: While the upfront cost is lower with EMR, the cost will increase over time because of the need for more frequent replacements due to the decrease in performance caused by wear and tear.
SSR: Typically lasts for millions of cycles without degradation.
EMR: Has a limited lifespan, typically around several hundred or thousand cycles, depending on load and usage.
SSR: Dreamlike in its utility for automation systems, medical devices, and other high-speed switching applications espoused by potential mechanical failures.
EMR: More appropriate for high power demanding tasks like motor drives or heaters when cost is a more deciding factor than relays operated with higher speeds.
SSR: Performs better in environments with high vibration, dust, and explosive risks due to their lack of moving parts.
EMR: Struggles in such environments as vibrations or environmental conditions can affect mechanical parts.
SSR: Positional insensitive, allowing for flexible installation in various orientations.
EMR: Positional sensitive, requiring proper orientation to ensure reliable operation.
Choosing between a solid state relay and a mechanical relay should be based on the requirements of your application:
For the quick switching, long life span, high energy efficiency and resistance to harsh vibrations and environments, Solid State Relays work best.
For high-load cost-efficient applications with significant starting currents, such as motors and other industrial equipment, Electromechanical Relays may be better.
Even if both solid state relays and electromechanical have their pros, SSR is usually better than EMR in switching speed, lifespan, and endurance to hostile conditions. Nonetheless, EMRs still have slightly more value in situations where high load capacity and lower initial costs are of greater importance.
Crydom Solid State Relays vs Electromechanical Relays
Solid State Relay vs Mechanical Relay: What is Different?
--- END ---